On a cool October morning in 1972, I woke up with a plan: I would write down every single sound I heard on that day. As soon as I was aware of a sound, I began to record what I heard in a small notebook. At the end of the day, exhausted, I fell back into bed and noted the last sounds I heard; the final sound was “breathing.” In the following days I went through the notebook, deciphering my scribbles and working out the grammatical kinks, resulting in a 60 page typed manuscript.
Since that day I’ve contemplated repeating the exercise, but the world is infinitely noisier now than it was back then. In any case, the piece stands on its own: a lopsided record of an ordinary day, made extraordinary by a single-minded focus on sound.
Here are a few excerpts from the Sounds piece, interspersed with images to complement, rather than explicitly adhere to, the narrative. I noted the time sporadically throughout the day, whenever I thought to look at a clock. In this excerpted version a line: ___________ means I’m skipping ahead to a later time in the day. I begin here at 9:30 am, a few hours after I woke up.
9:30am
light switch turning on
light switch turning off
stomach grumbling
sparrows chirping
blue jay calling
door opening
clothes sliding against each other
door closing
clothes falling on chair
paper falling on the floor
door opening
paper bag rustling
jars hitting each other
door closing
door opening
glass hitting the counter
door closing liquid pouring door opening
door closing
blue jay calling
___________________________

1:13pm
page turning
lid screwing on
swallowing
glass hitting other glass
paper rustling
biting
chewing
bell chiming
my voice
voice
match striking matchbook
paper sliding across table
paper rustling

my voice
voice
footsteps
siren whining
horn honking
bell chiming
liquid pouring
voice
my voice
footsteps
humming
chairs scraping the floor
voices
footsteps
banging
match striking matchbook

footsteps
crash
sirens whining
papers rustling
crash
piece of wood hitting table
voice
my voice
whistling
paper tearing
sandpaper sanding wood
swallowing
fingers scratching head
voice
my voice
burp
laughing
___________________________

6:40
truck passing on the street
feet stamping
hands clapping
fingers snapping
elevator door closing
laughing
cooing
voice
elevator door opening
elevator door closing
elevator door opening
elevator door closing
elevator door opening
footsteps
door opening
door closing
my voice
___________________

voice
slide projector motor running
laughing
voices
chairs creaking
whispering
paper rustling
cigarette pack dropping into bag
voices
coughing
pad rubbing leg
blowing
laughing
slide projector clicking
voices
laughing
voices
laughing
slide projector clicking
____________________________

8:40
my footsteps
ladder hitting the floor
my voice
voice
whistling
traffic passing on street
chewing
bus passing on street
hand rubbing my hair and face
elevator door opening
elevator door closing
elevator running
fingers tapping
elevator door opening

voice
radio
voices
laughing
whistling
plastic rustling
horn honking
voice
my voice
kiss
voices
kiss
laughing
my footsteps
my voice
kiss
my voice
nibbling
subway passing by
burp
motor in clock running

*
A few words of explanation: Early that morning I made a decision to record sounds by naming what made the sound, rather than spelling out what the noise sounded like. I quickly realized that trying to write down the actual sound I heard was impossible, in most cases. Using a tape recorder to make an actual recording was not a consideration, because my primary interest was in exploring the relationship – or the space, in a way – between the sensory traces an object makes (our perception) and a record of those traces, a concern that interests me to this day. *
What is different about a sound you hear and the mute, written words that describe that sound? What is lost and what is gained when you step back from direct experience, and put something – in this case, the written word – between you and the experience? What does a day look like when the traces that are left of it are only a written description of the sounds that were heard and some bits of memory? How is the shape of the day itself altered when one sensory component of it moves into the foreground?
I was in my final year at School of Visual Arts in New York when I made the Sounds piece. I had moved back to my parents’ house temporarily, after losing a shared Brooklyn loft and all my belongings in an unfortunate incident. Each morning that semester I awakened to the quiet of suburbia, then I commuted by bus to the city and took the subway to school or to my part time job as an artist’s assistant at a studio on Irving Place. On this October day I went to work first, then walked to an evening art history class, probably with Carter Ratcliff. Thankfully, those classes were usually a lecture with slides, and were relatively quiet. But as soon as my friends figured out what I was doing, they made their best efforts to interrupt any quiet that would give me a rest from mad scribbling in my notebook by producing an assortment of difficult-to-describe sounds. A few are seen above, along with my foot-stamping frustration. Unsurprisingly, it was for me, a day of few words.
I used a small notebook to write down what I heard that day. When I was in a quiet place I would hear the page turning. Later, when I typed up the piece, I chose to follow the same page spacing as in the original notebook, so that “page turning” appears at the top of some pages. The piece was submitted as part of my final work for a fine arts degree, and was well received. Now the paper edges have softened, the cover is tattered, and rust is slowly eating into the binder’s metal insert. I hope to transcribe and digitize it one of these days.
An earlier post on this subject with photos of the original manuscript is here.
The photos:
- A light fixture for sale at ABC Carpet and Home on Broadway, in New York City. I took the photo in New York on October 17, 2017, exactly 45 years after I made the Sounds piece. What goes around comes around; the artfully distressed wall behind the light is reminiscent of the way walls actually looked in downtown lofts in the early 70’s. It wasn’t chic then, it was just what existed.
- A rope-tied rock serves as a polite barrier in a path at Seattle’s Japanese Garden.
- A view of trees outside a window. A small piece of blue glass in a wood frame rests against the window.
- A collection of insects at an eccentric museum inside a Roman Catholic seminary in Mount Angel, Oregon.
- At the Seattle Japanese Garden, workers erected a tarp to protect plants while they worked on a new addition to a structure in the garden.
- Hoses on the old wood floor of an auto repair shop in Ferndale, California.
- The view across the street from the ABC store window where the lighting fixture photo above was taken. This view hasn’t changed since I was in school.
- A single rubber glove dropped on a sidewalk in Seattle.
* A concern with investigating the difference between objects as they are and as we perceive them was prevalent in the 1960’s and 70’s art world. It was a time when conceptual art questioned art itself, and minimalism was beginning to battle it out with post-minimalism, a term coined by art critic Robert Pincus-Witten, who taught at SVA. Dorothea Rockburne, one of a number of working artists who taught at SVA then, would often bring up Kant in connection with ideas like this one, from Wikipedia:
Kant argued the sum of all objects, the empirical world, is a complex of appearances whose existence and connection occur only in our representations.[2] Kant introduces the thing-in-itself as follows:
And we indeed, rightly considering objects of sense as mere appearances, confess thereby that they are based upon a thing in itself, though we know not this thing as it is in itself, but only know its appearances, viz., the way in which our senses are affected by this unknown something.
— Prolegomena, § 32